A Matter of Trust

By Michael Hardy | Fall 2014

Printer Friendly

Page 2 of 3

If a low-cost broker such as Ameritrade routes all its orders to the highest-paying venue—sending all its limit orders to EDGX and all its market orders to either wholesalers or BX—that means its limit orders may not get executed. Imagine that Microsoft shares are trading at $55. You place a limit order to buy 100 shares if the stock falls to $50, and your brokerage routes that order to EDGX, because they pay the most for limit orders. 

In a couple of hours, the price dips to $50 and I tell my own broker (who might be the same as yours) to place a market order to immediately sell my 100 shares of Microsoft. But instead of routing the order to EDGX, where I could sell my shares to you, my brokerage directs it to BX (in order to minimize fees), where it finds a different buyer, leaving you high and dry because after I sell my shares, the stock ticks up to $51 and your order goes unexecuted. 

True, the brokerage only gets paid for executed trades, but the firm is betting on the fact that if you can’t get the shares you at the higher price. Providing that the second order gets filled, the brokerage still pockets its same commission, but you lose $100 worth of potential profit.

Does the order routing decision matter in the real world? For actively traded, low-priced stocks including Sirius XM Radio and Microsoft, routing orders to the low-fee venue can improve the probability that limit orders execute by up to 25 percent. For higher priced stocks, such as Google, the routing decision is less important. 

While the payments seem miniscule, these rebates are a major source of revenue for both brokerages and exchanges—given enough trades, 30 cents per 100 shares can quickly add up. Indeed, prior to the June 17 subcommittee hearing, Ameritrade revealed that it earned revenues of $236 million from order routing in 2013. 

But for the average investor, isn’t 30 cents a small price to pay for the $9.99 trading fees that Ameritrade and other low-cost brokers offer? In response to this, Professor Battalio says, “The point is, what’s small? It’s a matter of trust—you’re supposed to be able to trust your broker, and if they’re going to do things to their advantage when they know you’re not looking, is that OK?” 

“The point is, what’s small? It’s a matter of trust—you’re supposed to be able to trust your broker, and if they’re going to do things to their advantage when they know you’re not looking, is that OK?” -Robert Battalio

Categories

  • Salt and Light10
    Salt & Light 1411
    Salt & Light: Passionate About Human Dignity 1461
    Salt & Light: There's Always Room in the Inn 1462
    Karen Hildebrandt: Quiet Hero 2612
    John Weber: The Importance of Being Turtles 2613
    Mike Mannor: New Hope for Down Syndrome 2614
    Maggie Neenan-Michel: Born to Run 2615
    Kristin Collett-Schmitt: To Honor Mackenzie 2616
    Jamie O'Brien: Cultivating Children 2626
    Karen Slaggert: Suffer the Little Children 2627
    More Salt & Light 2628
    Patti Reinhardt: Survivor's Tale 2629
  • Taking Stock - Personal Essays1
    Everyday Grace: On Stories 1444
  • Class Notes3
    Class Notes 1435
    Future Domers 2641
    In Memoriam 2642
  • Ask More of Business1
    Ask More: Grounds & Hounds 2636
  • Web Exclusive1
    Salt & Light: Passionate About Human Dignity 1461
    Salt & Light: There's Always Room in the Inn 1462
    "Shark Tank" Judge Visits Mendoza 1464
  • In Memoriam1
    In Memoriam 2642
  • Future Domers1
    Future Domers 2641
  • Mendoza News5
    A Meeting of Minds to Help the Poor 1340
    New Faculty Profile: Meet Charlice Hurst 1341
    A Matter of Trust 1352
    College News Briefs 1449
    Faculty News Briefs 2630
  • Mendoza Profiles2
    On and Off the Fence 1355
    A Poignant Journey 1373
  • Alumni Community4
    Class Notes 1435
    The Hessert Brothers: And They're Off 2547
    Kenn Ricci: Like Father, Like Son 2545
    Charles Florance: Inspirational Spirits 2546
  • First Person1
    Back to School 1443